Formal Definition
We say
is the limit of
at
if, for any
,
there exists a
such that whenever
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb8c5/eb8c5ae0978046e3ef286ef55ad0da0c19ddb657" alt="{\displaystyle \left|f(x)-L\right|\,<\,\epsilon .}"
An Explanation
When most students initially confront the definition above, they are
really confused. It helps to "unravel" the absolute values a bit.
For example,
is really the same thing as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ddfb/5ddfbf76d66f61f7965f6e8684ce335e053c9843" alt="{\displaystyle -\epsilon \,<\,f(x)-L\,<\,\epsilon .}"
If we then add
to each term, we arrive at
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ef32/3ef32bb7dced1b3350fc43e4cba0156e1ad871ee" alt="{\displaystyle L-\epsilon \,<\,f(x)\,<\,L+\epsilon .}"
In other words, we are trying to restrict
to the
-neighborhood centered at
, which is the interval
.
Similarly, we can rewrite
to become
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6453e/6453e12f3157ec4aea162981f9e60684a01c5a61" alt="{\displaystyle c-\delta \,<\,x\,<\,c+\delta .}"
On its own, this would mean
lies in the
-neighborhood
centered at
, which is the interval
. But
what about the other requirement, that
? This means we ignore
what happens at
.
This neighborhood - the interval
,
minus the point
- is known as a punctured neighborhood.
This definition can possibly be better understood through a short
video (best viewed fullscreen).
< Does not work on Internet Explorer >
<HTML5video width="640" height="420" autoplay="false">LimitDef</HTML5video>
Proof Approach
The goal in these proofs is always the same: we need to find a
,
which will usually be expressed in terms of an arbitrary
.
For example, we might have to choose a
, or a
,
or even a
. But in each case, we usually
build our proof backwards in what we can refer to as scratchwork.
Scratchwork begins by assuming our desired result, that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a2fb/6a2fb04a06dcea8c6879204edd569fd4fc3c0294" alt="{\displaystyle |f(x)-L|\,<\,\epsilon .}"
From here, we do whatever it takes (usually factoring) to change
into
. Once we have a statement of the form
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94459/944597942254da5f3e90a485e67032abcf213b77" alt="{\displaystyle |x-c|\,<\,{\textrm {something}},}"
this allows us to pick a
that will work. We then just reverse
the chain of equalities in our scratchwork to construct the proof.
It's easier to see in a few examples.
Examples with Linear Functions
Problem 1. Using the definition of a limit, show that
.
Solution. Looking at the statement we need to prove, we have
and
. Since
for all
, we know that for any
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/326c7/326c7d5b6cd26bd9ae0bb7ad3612f72c43d9fd6a" alt="{\displaystyle |f(x)-L|\,=\,|10-10|\,=\,0\,<\epsilon }"
as
must be strictly positive. This means any
will work. To write it out formally, you would proceed as follows:
Proof. Let
be given. Choose
. Then,
whenever
, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ca64/1ca642927ca04a550ef7baa48bad46019479a5ae" alt="{\displaystyle |f(x)-L|\ =\ |10-10|\ =\ 0\ <\ \epsilon .}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4883/f488345d2f8770729968ccd2c396cfc0230e3817" alt="{\displaystyle \square }"
A few quick notes about these types of proofs:
- Every one will begin with "let
be given." That's because most of the time, our
will be tied to the
.
- We conclude the proof with a box/square, indicating we're done.
Problem 2. Using the definition of a limit, show that
.
Solution. In this case, we have
and
.
We again begin with scratchwork, and assume our goal. If we knew
that
, then we would work to get an expression
that has
. It goes like this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d32/88d325f76516167be056dce738316e126bb99654" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ccccrcl}&&&&\left|(2x-4)-2\right|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|2x-6|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|2(x-3)|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&2|x-3|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|x-3|&<&{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{2}}.}\end{array}}}"
This gives us our
. We will choose a
.
But that was all scratchwork, and the formal writeup looks like a
bit different:
Proof. Let
be given. Choose
.
Then, whenever
, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12976/12976d21c0efb65a2ffd820f27da749f784ff0e5" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ccccrcl}&&&&|x-3|&<&{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{2}}}\\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|2x-6|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|2(x-3)|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|2x-6|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|(2x-4)-2|&<&{\displaystyle \epsilon }\\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|f(x)-L|&<&\epsilon ,\end{array}}}"
as required.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4883/f488345d2f8770729968ccd2c396cfc0230e3817" alt="{\displaystyle \square }"
It should be mentioned that in cases where
, and
,
we will get that
every time.
Examples with Quadratic Functions
Problem 3. Using the definition of a limit, show that
.
Solution. Here, we have
and
. We again
begin with scratchwork. Suppose
. We then solve
for
to find
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b85ba/b85ba3c6e4029089a7eb533aef19342b27a97a4a" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ccccrcl}&&&&\left|x^{2}-1\right|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|(x-1)(x+1)|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|x+1|\cdot |x-1|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|x-1|&<&{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{|x+1|}}.}\end{array}}}"
This certainly describes
in terms of
, but there's
also an
on the right hand side! This requires us to pick an "initial"
. Let's choose
. Then, whenever
,
we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37db9/37db9a61cb5bee547517b5070da333984746b5e9" alt="{\displaystyle -\delta \,=\,-1\,<\,x-1\,<\,1\,=\,\delta ,}"
in the manner explained in An Explanation. More importantly, by
adding two to the inequality we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3ecb/c3ecbd6d6ac78e246498089f8afc8362fe2b930d" alt="{\displaystyle 1\,<\,x+1\,<\,3.\qquad \qquad \qquad (\dagger )}"
Dividing
by this inequality (which reverses its direction),
we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffce6/ffce6cfbc179ccdae21c62022a32ae4e51e7afd3" alt="{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{3}}\,<\,{\frac {\epsilon }{x+1}}\,=\,{\frac {\epsilon }{|x+1|}}\,<\,{\frac {\epsilon }{1}}\,=\,\epsilon .}"
This means that for any
satisfying
, we know that
.
Thus, we can choose a
, and the proof should work.
There's a small problem, though - we already chose a
.
The way around this is to use the minimum function:
When we write
, it means to take whichever is the
least of both
and
.
Now, our proof can be written.
Proof. Let
be given. Choose
.
Then, whenever
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8cb5/d8cb599dba3d7fb775cfd0b33ceea5c294502489" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ccrcrclccccc}&&&&|x-1|&<&{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{3}}}\\\\\Rightarrow &&&&3|x-1|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&|x+1||x-1|&<&3|x-1|&<&\epsilon &&&&&{\textrm {(using~}}\dagger )\\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|x^{2}-1|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|f(x)-L|&<&\epsilon ,\end{array}}}"
as required.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4883/f488345d2f8770729968ccd2c396cfc0230e3817" alt="{\displaystyle \square }"
Problem 4. Using the definition of a limit, show that
.
Solution. This time,
and
. We follow
the same pattern, doing the scratchwork first. Assume
.
Then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcc98/bcc984dbd375ebf54eca4a9309ad132ef9f7c2d1" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ccccrcl}&&&&\left|3x^{2}-12\right|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&3|x^{2}-4|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&3|(x+2|\cdot |x-2)|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|x-2|&<&{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{3|x+2|}}.}\end{array}}}"
Based on the previous problem, let's choose an initial
.
Then we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b568/4b568021722c7919a3a59271705d88a132ef8820" alt="{\displaystyle -\delta \,=\,-1\,<\,x-2\,<\,1\,=\,\delta .}"
Now adding 4 to the inequality, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37e48/37e484c20b28edbd4a394d7d112678915c6fd5bb" alt="{\displaystyle 3\,<\,x+2\,<\,5.\qquad \qquad \qquad (\dagger \dagger )}"
Dividing
by this inequality, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82097/82097a526b59f34f7588dcefd210b30e81ef402e" alt="{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{5}}\,<\,{\frac {\epsilon }{|x+2|}}\,<\,{\frac {\epsilon }{3}}.}"
So we can choose
Then the proof works.
Proof. Let
be given. Choose
.
Then, whenever
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81937/81937b7cfdc7e5f90f95b3ddb6a7edc8733c2067" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ccrcrclccccc}&&&&|x-2|&<&{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{15}}}\\\\\Rightarrow &&&&15|x-2|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&3|x+2||x-2|&<&15|x-2|&<&\epsilon &&&&&{\textrm {(using~}}\dagger \dagger )\\\\\Rightarrow &&3|x^{2}-4|&&&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&|3x^{2}-12|&&&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|f(x)-L|&<&\epsilon ,\end{array}}}"
as required.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4883/f488345d2f8770729968ccd2c396cfc0230e3817" alt="{\displaystyle \square }"
Problem 5. Using the definition of a limit, show that
.
Solution. Here, we have
and
.
We again begin with scratchwork, assuming
. Then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43f4a/43f4ad8e8c6760471d36f134a0b5a586cb64630d" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ccccrcl}&&&&\left|x^{2}+3x+1-11\right|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|x^{2}+3x-10|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|(x+5)(x-2)|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|(x+5|\cdot |x-2)|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|x-2|&<&{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{|x+5|}}.}\end{array}}}"
Now, we again assume
, so
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcf64/dcf64cb73e7019eefa46bc069f8445f05d73be48" alt="{\displaystyle -\delta \,=\,-1\,<\,x-2\,<\,1\,=\,\delta ,}"
and adding seven to the inequality,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd450/dd450cbd04ae61d979c8d6ec8c0f833907f89507" alt="{\displaystyle -\delta \,=\,6\,<\,x+5\,<\,1\,=\,7.\qquad \qquad \qquad (\natural )}"
Again, dividing
by we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5180/e5180938e462dfb531867d77021054279f62c8dc" alt="{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{7}}\,<\,{\frac {\epsilon }{|x+5|}}\,<\,{\frac {\epsilon }{5}}}"
for all
satisfying
We can now write the proof.
Proof. Let
be given. Choose
.
Then, whenever
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/139ab/139ab8b4df695417beca39e4bae43c29dd1dbe37" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ccrcrclccccl}&&&&|x-2|&<&{\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{7}}}\\\\\Rightarrow &&&&7|x-2|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&|x+5||x-2|&<&7|x-2|&<&\epsilon &&&&&{\textrm {(using~}}\natural )\\\\\Rightarrow &&|x^{2}+3x-10|&&&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&|x^{2}+3x+1-11|&&&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&&|f(x)-L|&<&\epsilon ,\end{array}}}"
as required.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4883/f488345d2f8770729968ccd2c396cfc0230e3817" alt="{\displaystyle \square }"
Other Examples
Problem 6. Using the definition of a limit, show that
.
Solution. We have
and
. We start
our scratchwork as usual, assuming
. Then we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f96b/6f96b9cebcbdab4091c628566489138ea97dfdd4" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{cccrcl}&&&|{\sqrt {x}}-1|&<&{\displaystyle \epsilon }\\\\\Rightarrow &&&|{\sqrt {x}}+1|\cdot |{\sqrt {x}}-1&<&|{\sqrt {x}}+1|\cdot \epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&|x-1|&<&|{\sqrt {x}}+1|\cdot \epsilon .\end{array}}}"
Similar to the quadratic examples, we can set an initial
Then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37db9/37db9a61cb5bee547517b5070da333984746b5e9" alt="{\displaystyle -\delta \,=\,-1\,<\,x-1\,<\,1\,=\,\delta ,}"
and adding one to each term we find
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d2e2/9d2e2fbe101bcf09bbabf1b704ddb18f948fe498" alt="{\displaystyle 0\,<\,x\,<\,2.}"
This, in turn, means that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc79e/cc79e7d90b0056b5ac2c969e568f255d31d74623" alt="{\displaystyle 1\,<\,{\sqrt {x}}+1\,<\,{\sqrt {2}}+1.}"
Multiplying the inequality by
, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a4d/a2a4d88665c263b5d472596bc2a00d32d4b0b464" alt="{\displaystyle \epsilon \,<\,|{\sqrt {x}}+1|\,<\,\left({\sqrt {2}}+1\right)\epsilon \qquad {\mbox{while}}\qquad {\frac {\epsilon }{{\sqrt {2}}+1}}\,<\,{\frac {\epsilon }{|{\sqrt {x}}+1|}}\,<\,{\frac {\epsilon }{1}}.}"
for all
satisfying
. This gives us our
,
and we can write the proof.
Proof. Let
be given. Choose
.
Then, whenever
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0ad4/d0ad423c123c9ed71816e6232cff0d387eca474b" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{cccrclcc}&&&|x-1|&<&{\displaystyle \epsilon }\\\\\Rightarrow &&&|({\sqrt {x}}+1)({\sqrt {x}}-1)|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&\left|{\sqrt {x}}+1\right|\cdot \left|{\sqrt {x}}-1\right|&<&\epsilon \\\\\Rightarrow &&&\left|{\sqrt {x}}-1\right|&<&\displaystyle {\frac {\epsilon }{\left|{\sqrt {x}}+1\right|}}&<&\epsilon ,\end{array}}}"
as required. Notice that we used both of the inequalities involving
and
to complete the proof.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4883/f488345d2f8770729968ccd2c396cfc0230e3817" alt="{\displaystyle \square }"
There are many more difficult examples, but these are meant as an introduction.