Sigma Notation
In math, we frequently deal with large sums. For example, we can write
which is a bit tedious. Alternatively, we may use ellipses to write
this as
However, there is an even more powerful shorthand for sums known as sigma notation. When we write
this means the same thing as the previous two mathematical statements.
Here, the index below the capital sigma, , is the letter , and the that follows the is our rule to
apply to each value of within the limits. The limits and tell us how many times to repeat the rule, i.e., to follow the rule for
then add the rule for then for and continue in this
manner until you reach In other words,
Of course, we can change the rule and/or the index. For example,
Most importantly, we frequently don't have the luxury of bounds that
are actual values. We can also write something like
or
These non-fixed indices allow us to find rules for evaluating some
important sums.
Proof by (Weak) Induction
When we count with natural or counting numbers (frequently denoted ), we begin with one, then keep adding one unit at a
time to get the next natural number. We then add one to that result to get the next natural number, and continue in this manner. In other words,
This is the basis for weak, or simple induction; we must first prove our conjecture is true for the lowest value (usually, but not necessarily ), and then
show whenever it's true for an arbitrary it's true for
as well. This mimics our development of the natural numbers.
It is also equivalent to prove that whenever the conjecture is true for it's true for Which approach you choose can depend on which is more convenient, or possibly which is more appealing to the teacher grading the work. We will use this style for the proofs on this page.
Although we won't show examples here, there are induction proofs that require strong induction. This occurs when proving it for the case requires assuming more than just the
case. In such situations, strong induction assumes that the conjecture is true for ALL cases from down to our base case.
The Sum of the first n Natural Numbers
Claim. The sum of the first natural numbers is
Proof. We must follow the guidelines shown for induction arguments.
Our base step is and plugging in we find that
Which is clearly the sum of the single integer . This gives us our starting point. For the induction step, let's assume
the claim is true for so
Now, we have
as required.
The Sum of the first n Squares
Claim. The sum of the first squares is
Proof. Again, our base step is and plugging in we find
that
so the rule is certainly true when
This gives us our starting point. For the induction step, let's assume
the claim is true for so
Now, we have
as required.
The Sum of the first n Cubes
Claim. The sum of the first cubes is
Notice that the formula is really similar to that for the first
natural numbers.
Proof. Plugging in we find that
completing our base step.
For the induction step, let's assume the claim is true for
so
Now, we have
as required.
Aside from being good examples of proof by simple or weak induction, these formulas are useful to find an integral as a limit of a Riemann sum.