Difference between revisions of "022 Exam 2 Sample A, Problem 9"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<span class="exam"> Find all relative extrema and points of inflection for the function <math style="vertical-align: -45%">g(x) = \frac{2}{3}x^3 + x^2 - 12x</math>. Be sure to...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|'''Second Derivative Test:''' If the first derivative at a point <math style="vertical-align: -12%">x_0</math> is <math style="vertical-align: 0%">0</math>, and the second derivative is negative (indicating it is concave-down, like an upside-down parabola), then the point <math style="vertical-align: -20%">\left(x_0,f(x_0)\right)</math> is a local maximum. | |'''Second Derivative Test:''' If the first derivative at a point <math style="vertical-align: -12%">x_0</math> is <math style="vertical-align: 0%">0</math>, and the second derivative is negative (indicating it is concave-down, like an upside-down parabola), then the point <math style="vertical-align: -20%">\left(x_0,f(x_0)\right)</math> is a local maximum. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |On the other hand, if the second derivative is positive, the point <math style="vertical-align: -20%">\left(x_0,f(x_0)\right)</math> is a local minimum. You can also use the first derivative test, but it is usually a bit more work! For inflection points, we need to find when the second derivative is zero, as well as check that the second derivative "splits" on both sides. | + | |On the other hand, if the second derivative is positive, the point <math style="vertical-align: -20%">\left(x_0,f(x_0)\right)</math> is a local minimum. You can also use the first derivative test, but it is usually a bit more work! For '''inflection points''', we need to find when the second derivative is zero, as well as check that the second derivative "splits" on both sides. |
|} | |} | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | ::<math>g\,''(x)\,=\,4x+2\,=\, | + | ::<math>g\,''(x)\,=\,4x+2\,=\,4\left(x+\frac{1}{2}\right).</math> |
|- | |- | ||
|This has a single root: <math style="vertical-align: -60%">x=-\frac{1}{2}</math>. | |This has a single root: <math style="vertical-align: -60%">x=-\frac{1}{2}</math>. | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
::<math>g(-3)\,=\,\frac{2}{3}(-27)+9-12(-3)\,=\,27.</math> | ::<math>g(-3)\,=\,\frac{2}{3}(-27)+9-12(-3)\,=\,27.</math> | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |By the second derivative test, the point <math style="vertical-align: -70%">(2,g(2))=\left(2,-\frac{44}{3}\right)</math> is a relative | + | |By the second derivative test, the point <math style="vertical-align: -70%">(2,g(2))=\left(2,-\frac{44}{3}\right)</math> is a relative minimum, while the point <math style="vertical-align: -22%">(-3,g(-3))=(-3,27)</math> is a relative maximum. |
|} | |} | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
!Step 4: | !Step 4: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''Test the potential inflection point:''' We know that <math style="vertical-align: - | + | |'''Test the potential inflection point:''' We know that <math style="vertical-align: -25%">g\,''(-1/2)=0</math>. On the other hand, it should be clear that if <math style="vertical-align: -25%">x<-1/2</math>, then <math style="vertical-align: -23%">g\,''(x)<0</math>. Similarly, if <math style="vertical-align: -25%">x>-1/2</math>, then <math style="vertical-align: -23%">g\,''(x)>0</math>. Thus, the second derivative "splits" around <math style="vertical-align: -25%">x=-1/2</math>  (i.e., changes sign), so the point <math style="vertical-align: -25%">\left(-1/2,g(-1/2)\right)</math>  is an inflection point. |
|- | |- | ||
|Since | |Since | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | ::<math>g\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)\,=\,\frac{2}{3}\ | + | ::<math>g\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)\,=\,\frac{2}{3}\left(-\frac{1}{8}\right)+\frac{1}{4}-12\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)\,=\,\frac{37}{6},</math> |
|- | |- | ||
|our inflection point is | |our inflection point is | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | ::<math>\left(-\frac{1}{2},\frac{ | + | ::<math>\left(-\frac{1}{2},\frac{37}{6}\right).</math> |
|} | |} | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
!Final Answer: | !Final Answer: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |There is a local minimum at <math style="vertical-align: -70%">\left(2,-\frac{44}{3}\right)</math>, a local maximum at <math style="vertical-align: -22%">(-3,27)</math> and an inflection point at <math style="vertical-align: -70%">\left(-\frac{1}{2},\frac{37}{6}\right).</math> |
|} | |} | ||
[[022_Exam_2_Sample_A|'''<u>Return to Sample Exam</u>''']] | [[022_Exam_2_Sample_A|'''<u>Return to Sample Exam</u>''']] |
Latest revision as of 07:12, 16 May 2015
Find all relative extrema and points of inflection for the function . Be sure to give coordinate pairs for each point. You do not need to draw the graph.
Foundations: |
---|
Since our function is a polynomial, the relative extrema occur when the first derivative is zero. We then have two choices for finding if it is a local maximum or minimum: |
Second Derivative Test: If the first derivative at a point is , and the second derivative is negative (indicating it is concave-down, like an upside-down parabola), then the point is a local maximum. |
On the other hand, if the second derivative is positive, the point is a local minimum. You can also use the first derivative test, but it is usually a bit more work! For inflection points, we need to find when the second derivative is zero, as well as check that the second derivative "splits" on both sides. |
Solution:
Step 1: |
---|
Find the first and second derivatives: Based on our function, we have |
|
Similarly, from the first derivative we find |
|
Step 2: |
---|
Find the roots of the derivatives: We can rewrite the first derivative as |
|
from which it should be clear we have roots and . |
On the other hand, for the second derivative, we have |
|
This has a single root: . |
Step 3: |
---|
Test the potential extrema: We know that are the candidates. We check the second derivative, finding |
|
while |
|
Note that |
|
while |
|
By the second derivative test, the point is a relative minimum, while the point is a relative maximum. |
Step 4: |
---|
Test the potential inflection point: We know that . On the other hand, it should be clear that if , then . Similarly, if , then . Thus, the second derivative "splits" around (i.e., changes sign), so the point is an inflection point. |
Since |
|
our inflection point is |
|
Final Answer: |
---|
There is a local minimum at , a local maximum at and an inflection point at |