Difference between revisions of "009C Sample Midterm 3, Problem 2"

From Math Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 45: Line 45:
 
\end{array}</math>
 
\end{array}</math>
 
|-
 
|-
|Notice the pattern: for any fraction of the form<math>\frac{1}{(x+a)(x+b)}</math> where<math>a<b,</math> we have
+
|Notice the pattern: for any fraction of the form <math style="vertical-align: -20%">\frac{1}{(x+a)(x+b)}</math> where <math style="vertical-align: -20%">a<b,</math> we have
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
|
 
|
Line 81: Line 81:
 
\end{array}</math>  
 
\end{array}</math>  
 
|-
 
|-
|Notice the pattern; each time there are ''<u>exactly</u>'' two surviving positive terms, and two surviving negative terms. This is ''<u>exactly</u>'' the difference between the two factors <math style="vertical-align: 0%">n-1</math> and <math style="vertical-align: 0%">n+1</math>in the denominator. If we then take the limit, we find  
+
|Notice the pattern; each time there are ''<u>exactly</u>'' two surviving positive terms, and two surviving negative terms. If we then take the limit, we find  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 100: Line 100:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
::<math>S\,=\,\frac{a_{0}}{1-r}\,=\,\frac {1/2}{1-(-1/3)}\,=\,\frac{1/2}{4/3}\,=\,\frac{3}{2}.</math>
+
::<math>S\,=\,\frac{a_{0}}{1-r}\,=\,\frac {1/2}{1-(-1/3)}\,=\,\frac{1/2}{4/3}\,=\,\frac{3}{8}.</math>
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;"
 
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;"
 
!(b): &nbsp;
 
!(b): &nbsp;
 +
|-
 +
|Using the technique in Foundations, we can rewrite the sequence as
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
::<math> \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\,\frac{3}{(2n-1)(2n+1)}\,=\,3 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\,\frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{1}{2n-1}-\frac{1}{2n+1}\right).</math>
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
Writing a few terms out, we find
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
::<math>S\,=\,\frac{3}{2}\left(\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{5}-\frac{1}{7}+\cdots \right).</math>
 +
|-
 +
|Since only one positive term and one negative term survive, we have
 +
|-
 +
|<math> S_k \,=\,\frac{3}{2}\left( 1-\frac{1}{2k+1} \right),</math>
 +
|-
 +
|so the series converges to the sum ''S'', where
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
::<math>S\,=\,\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} S_k\,=\,\frac{3}{2}.</math>
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;"
 
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;"
 
!Final Answer: &nbsp;
 
!Final Answer: &nbsp;
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|The series in (a) converges to <math style="vertical-align: -23%">3/8</math>, while the series in (b) converges to <math style="vertical-align: -21%">3/2</math>.
 
|}
 
|}
 
[[009C_Sample_Midterm_3|'''<u>Return to Sample Exam</u>''']]
 
[[009C_Sample_Midterm_3|'''<u>Return to Sample Exam</u>''']]

Revision as of 20:01, 26 April 2015

For each the following series find the sum, if it converges. If you think it diverges, explain why.

(a) (6 points)     


(b) (6 points)     
Foundations:  
One of the important series to know is the Geometric series. These are series with a common ratio between adjacent terms which are usually written
These are convergent if , and divergent if . If it is convergent, we can find the sum by the formula

where is the first term in the series (if the index starts at or , then "" is actually the first term or , respectively).
Another common type of series to evaluate is a telescoping series, where the telescoping better describes the partial sums, denoted . Most of the time, they are presented as a fraction which requires partial fraction decomposition.
This can be accomplished fairly quickly via a shortcut when the factors in the denominator are linear and share the same coefficient on .
Example. Suppose we wish to decompose the fraction . First, consider the difference
If we combine this to a common denominator, we find
To have a 1 in the numerator, we would just multiply by or the reciprocal of the difference between the two constants. Thus
Notice the pattern: for any fraction of the form where we have
In this manner, we can quickly find that
As per the so-called telescoping, consider the series defined by
Using the technique above, we can rewrite the series as
This means that
Notice the pattern; each time there are exactly two surviving positive terms, and two surviving negative terms. If we then take the limit, we find

 Solution:

(a):  
This is the easier portion of the problem. Each term grows by a ratio of , and it reverses sign. Thus, there is a common ratio . Also, the first term is , so we can write the series as a geometric series:
Then, the series converges to the sum
(b):  
Using the technique in Foundations, we can rewrite the sequence as

Writing a few terms out, we find

Since only one positive term and one negative term survive, we have
so the series converges to the sum S, where
Final Answer:  
The series in (a) converges to , while the series in (b) converges to .

Return to Sample Exam